TEENS 4 SULLIVAN 2010
FORUM
NEWS

 

Voted on House floor for amendment to end visa lottery in 2005


Rep. Sullivan voted in favor of the Goodlatte Amendment to H.R. 4437, the Border Protection, Antiterrorism, and Illegal Immigration Control Act of 2005. The Goodlatte Amendment would eliminate the visa lottery. This is a program that each year gives another 50,000 green cards to people without any regard to their humanitarian need or to what they might offer the country or to their having any family connections in the United States. It is a program that promotes massive illegal migration by people who think they may some day win the lottery and be allowed to stay in the United States. The bi-partisan U.S. Commission on Immigration Reform under the leadership of the late Barbara Jordan recommended eliminating the visa lottery. The Goodlatte Amendment passed by a vote of 273 to 148.
Major Numbers in All Categoriestop
Voted on floor of House in favor of amendment to prohibit legal status to aliens with a criminal record in 2005


Rep. Sullivan voted in favor of the Stearns Amendment to H.R. 4437, the Border Protection, Antiterrorism, and Illegal Immigration Control Act of 2005. The Stearns Amendment prohibits any alien from being granted legal immigration status of any kind until criminal record databases and terrorist watch lists are checked, and it is confirmed that no fraud has occurred. This amendment would subject each and every individual who seeks any sort of legal immigration status to a criminal background check and a review of terrorist watch lists to ensure that the United States only grants immigration status those who do not wish our citizens harm. The Stearns Amendment passed by a vote of 420 to 0.

Importing Specific Foreign WorkerstopVoted in favor of amendment to prohibit immigration increases in Free Trade Agreements in 2005

Rep. Sullivan voted in favor of the Tancredo Amendment to H.R. 2862, the Science, State, Justice, Commerce (SSJC), and Related Agencies Appropriations Act of 2006. The Tancredo Amendment would have prohibited the use of SSJC funds to include in any bilateral or multilateral trade agreement any provisions that would increase immigration. This effectively would have prevented the U.S. Trade Representative from including immigration increases in Free Trade Agreements (as occured with the Sinagpore and Chile Free Trade Agreements, for instance). The Tancredo Amendment failed by a vote of 106 to 322.

Voted in favor of preventing illegal aliens from voting in union elections

Rep. Sullivan voted in favor of a Motion to Recommit H.R. 800, the Employee Free Choice Act of 2007. The Motion to Recommit, introduced by Rep. McKeon (R-CA), would have recommitted H.R. 800 to the Committee on Education and Labor with instructions to report the legislation back to the House with an amendment that would require that all employees allowed to vote in union elections be citizens or legal residents of the United States. This would have prevented illegal aliens from voting in unionization elections. This would have been an important interior enforcement measure because illegal aliens should not be allowed to have an influence in whether a workforce decides to be unionized or to block unionization. Businesses should not be allowed to use illegal aliens to stop unionization desired by its American workers. And unions should not be allowed to use illegal aliens to force unionization on American workers who don't want it. Although some Representatives voted against the Motion to Recommit because it would have delayed final passage of the bill, a vote in favor of the Motion to Recommit was clearly a vote in favor of interior enforcement and against allowing illegal aliens to vote in union elections. Motion to The Motion to Recommit failed by a vote of 202-225.

Voted in favor of bill to increase interior enforcement in 2006

Rep. Sullivan voted in favor of H.R. 6095, the Immigration Law Enforcement Act of 2006>Immigration Law Enforcement Act of 2006 which would clarify state and local law enforcement’s inherent authority to enforce Federal immigration laws and overturn a decades-old court injunction that impedes the Federal government’s ability to remove aliens from El Salvador on an expedited basis. H.R. 6095 passed by a vote of 277-140.
Voted in favor of bill to outlaw border tunnels in 2006

Rep. Sullivan voted in favor of H.R. 4830, the Border Tunnel Protection Act of 2006 that would penalize any person constructing or financing a border tunnel with up to 20 years’ imprisonment and anybody who recklessly permits others to construct or use such a tunnel on their land with up to 10 years’ imprisonment; would punish those who use a border tunnel to smuggle aliens (including terrorists and criminals), weapons, drugs, and other illicit goods by doubling the sentence for the underlying offense (i.e., up to 40 years’ imprisonment). H.R. 4830 passed by a vote of 422 to 0.
Voted in favor of border fence in 2006

Rep. Sullivan voted in favor of H.R. 6061, the Secure Fence Act of 2006. H.R. 6061: requires the Department of Homeland Security to construct 700 miles of reinforced fencing along the U.S.-Mexico border; provides for the installation of additional physical barriers, roads, lighting, cameras, and sensors in five specified lengths (encompassing approximately 700 miles) along the United States’ southwestern border; requires DHS to study the necessity, feasibility, and economic impact of constructing a similar barrier along the U.S.-Canada border; enhances border infrastructure, including checkpoints, roads, and vehicle barriers; and requires DHS to achieve and maintain "operational control" of our borders within 18 months of enactment and require reports on the progress toward this goal. H.R. 6061 passed by a vote of 283-138-1 (1 denotes a vote of "present.")
Voted against sanctuary policies for illegal aliens in 2006

Rep. Sullivan voted in favor of the King Amendment to H.R. 5441, the fiscal year 2007 Department of Homeland Security (DHS) appropriations bill. The amendment would deny federal homeland security funding to state and local governments who refuse to share information with Federal immigration authorities. The King Amendment would be a huge incentive to rescind the policies that protect illegal aliens, criminal aliens, and, potentially, terrorists, by denying states and localities that enact them some Federal funding. Sanctuary policies bar public officials, including police officers, from asking an individual's immigration status and from reporting illegal aliens to federal authorities. In 1996, Congress passed a law that specifically prohibits state and local governments from enacting sanctuary policies. Despite that, cities such as San Francisco, Los Angeles, Chicago and Houston, still have sanctuary policies in place. Maine is the only state with a sanctuary policy. The amendment passed by a vote of 218 to 179.
Voted in favor of amendment to end special amnesty for certain Central Americans in 2006

Rep. Sullivan voted in favor of the Tancredo Amendment to H.R. 5541, the fiscal year 2007 Department of Homeland Security (DHS) appropriations bill. The Tancredo Amendment would prohibit funds appropriated by H.R. 5441 from being used to administer the continuation of Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for nationals of Guatemala, Honduras, or Nicaragua announced by DHS before the bill's enactment. Temporary Protected Status provides a temporary amnesty for certain illegal aliens from designated countries. The Tancredo Amendment failed by a vote of 184-284-1 (the "1" was a "present" vote).
Voted in favor of amendment to fund employment eligibility verification system in 2006

Rep. Sullivan voted in favor of the Marshall Amendment to H.R. 5441, the fiscal year 2007 Department of Homeland Security (DHS) appropriations bill. The Marshall Amendment would increase funding for USCIS' employment verification program by $20 million. This program , which is currently voluntary, allows employers to electronically check the eligibility of new employees to work in the United States. However, in December, 2005, the House passed H.R. 4437 which makes the program mandatory. The Marshall Amendment would fund this program. The Marshall Amendment passed by a vote of 358-63.

Voted on floor of the House for final passage of border security and enforcement bill in 2005


Rep. Sullivan voted in favor of H.R. 4437, the Border Protection, Antiterrorism, and Illegal Immigration Control Act of 2005. H.R. 4437, as amended and passed, includes major improvements in interior enforcement and border security, as well as a reduction in legal immigration numbers. Among its most significant provisions are: a requirement that all businesses must use an electronic system to check if all new hires have the legal right to work in the country; additional security fencing along the Mexican border; a mandate that the federal government cooperate with local authorities in picking up all illegal aliens they detain; and elimination of the visa lottery program that each year awards 50,000 green cards to randomly selected winners. H.R. 4437 passed by a vote of 239 to 182.
Voted on the floor of the House in favor of amendment to require implementation of entry-exit system in 2005

Rep. Sullivan voted in favor of the Sullivan Amendment to H.R. 4437, the Border Protection, Antiterrorism, and Illegal Immigration Control Act of 2005. The Sullivan Amendment requires full implementation of the automated entry-exit system that was instituted by Congress in 1996. As well, it requires the removal of unlawfully present aliens unless they fear persecution at home or are seeking asylum. It also reinforces the important role of state and local law enforcement in the fight against illegal immigration. The Sullivan Amendment failed by a vote of 163 to 251.
Voted on House floor for amendment to increase security with border fence in 2005

Rep. Sullivan voted in favor of the Hunter Amendment to H.R. 4437, the Border Protection, Antiterrorism, and Illegal Immigration Control Act of 2005. The Hunter Amendment would shore up security by building fences and other physical infrastructure to keep out illegal aliens. Specifically, it mandates the construction of specific security fencing, including lights and cameras, along the Southwest border for the purposes of gaining operational control of the border. As well, it includes a requirement for the Secretary of Homeland Security to conduct a study on the use of physical barriers along the Northern border. The Hunter Amendment passed by a vote of 260-159.
Voted against sanctuary policies for illegal aliens in 2005


Rep. Sullivan voted in favor of H. Amdt. 288 to H.R. 2862, the the Science, Departments of State, Justice, and Commerce Appropriations, 2006 Act. The amendment, offered by Rep. Tom Tancredo (R-CO) would deny federal funding to states and cities that are in violation of section 642(a) of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996. This is the provision that specifically prohibits state and local governments from enacting sanctuary policies that bar public officials, including police officers, from asking an individual's immigration status to determine eligibility for public services and from reporting illegal aliens to federal authorities. Despite that, cities such as San Francisco, Los Angeles, Chicago and Houston, still have sanctuary policies in place. Maine is the only state with a sanctuary policy. The Tancredo Amendment would have created an incentive for states and cities to follow federal law prohibiting policies that protect illegal aliens, criminal aliens, and, potentially, terrorists. The amendment failed by a vote of 204 to 222.
Voted against sanctuary policies for illegal aliens in 2005


Rep. Sullivan voted in favor of an amendment (H. Admt. 138) to H.R. 2360, the Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Act, 2006. The amendment would deny federal homeland security funding to states and local governments who refuse to share information with Federal immigration authorities. The amendment, offered by Rep. Tom Tancredo (R-CO), would have created a huge incentive to rescind the policies that protect illegal aliens, criminal aliens, and, potentially, terrorists, by denying them some Federal funding. Sanctuary policies bar public officials, including police officers, from asking an individual's immigration status to determine eligibility for public services and from reporting illegal aliens to federal authorities. In 1996, Congress passed a law that specifically prohibits state and local governments from enacting sanctuary policies. Despite that, cities such as San Francisco, Los Angeles, Chicago and Houston, still have sanctuary policies in place. Maine is the only state with a sanctuary policy. The amendment failed by a vote of 165 to 285.
Voted against amendment to fund program to deny driver's licenses to illegal aliens in 2005

Rep. Sullivan voted against the Obey amendment ( H. Amdt. 144) to H.R. 2360, the Department of Homeland Security Appropriations bill. The Obey amendment provided $100 million to fund grants under the REAL ID Act to assist States in conforming with minimum drivers’ license standards. The Obey amendment passed by a vote of 226-198.
Voted to authorize the use of the military to assist in border control functions in 2005

Rep. Sullivan voted in favor of H. Amdt. 206 to H.R. 1815. The amendment authorizes the Secretary of Defense to assign members of the military, under certain circumstances, to assist the Bureau of Border Security and U.S. Customs Service of the Department of Homeland Security on preventing the entry of terrorists, drug traffickers, and illegal aliens into the United States The amendment, sponsored by Rep. Goode of Virginia, passed the House by a vote of 245-184.
Voted in favor of bill to bar drivers' licenses for illegal aliens in 2005

Rep. Sullivan voted on the floor of the House in favor of H.R. 418, the REAL ID Act. This legislation would set federal standards for the issuance of drivers' licenses and require proof of "legal presence" in order to obtain a driver's license. This would make illegal aliens ineligible for drivers' licenses. As well, H.R. 418 would tie the driver's license expiration date of a temporary visa holder to the expiration date of their visa so that those who enter the country legally as visa holders, but become illegal aliens by overstaying their visas will not have a valid driver's license after the date of the expiration of their visa. In addition, H.R. 418 includes provisions to broaden the terrorism-related grounds for inadmissibility and deportability of aliens, and to complete construction of the San Diego border fence. H.R. 418 would deter illegal immigration by making it more difficult for illegal aliens to enter and to remain in the United States. It also would reduce significantly the risk that terrorists will be able to game our asylum system or avoid removal because of loopholes in our immigration laws. H.R. 418 was passed by the House of Representatives by a vote of 261-161.
Voted against amendment to strip asylum reforms from H.R. 418 in 2005

Rep. Sullivan voted against the Nadler Amendment to H.R. 418. The Nadler Amendment was an amendment to strike Section 101 of H.R. 418. Section 101 of H.R. 418 is the section includes reforms of our asylum laws to prevent terrorists from gaming our asylum system. Specifically, it includes provisions to ensure that our asylum system is consistent with our justice system in which the trier of fact is always allowed to use the credibility of the defendant and witnesses in deciding the case. Requiring an asylum claimant to bear the burden of proof is consistent both with our justice system and with international law, which says we must grant asylum to an alien who has been persecuted or has a well-founded fear of persecution on account of race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group, or political opinion (the five grounds agreed upon in the Geneva Convention). The Nadler Amendment failed by a vote of 185-236.
Voted in favor of the Rule that incorporated the Manager's Amendment to strengthen some of the key immigration reforms of H.R. 418 in 2005

Rep. Sullivan voted in favor of the rule that incorporated the Manager's Amendment to H.R. 418 (H. Res. 75). H.R. 418 was brought to the House floor for consideration under a rule that incorporated an amendment by the bill's sponsor, Chairman Sensenbrenner. Because the rule included the amendment, a vote for the rule did two things: 1) like any rule for consideration, it established the time limits for debate of the bill and permitted the debate to begin; and 2) it added the text of the Manager's Amendment to the original bill. The Manager's Amendment included the following changes to strengthen the provisions of H.R. 418: requires immigration judges to determine an alien's credibility before granting relief or protection from removal; limits deportable aliens' ability to stall their deportation by filing endless appeals in court; and strikes both the section of the bill that explicitly recognizes states' ability to issue "driving certificates" that do not comply with the standards, and the provision that permits the Department of Homeland Security to regulate such alternative licenses. The Manager's Amendment also included a provision to eliminate the cap of 10,000 per year on the number of asylees who may apply for adjustment to permanent resident status after residing in the U.S. for at least one year following the grant of asylum. However the rest of the provisions of the Manager's Amendment more than make up this provision, since asylees already are virtually assured permanent resident status eventually. The Manager's Amendment passed by a vote of 228-198.
Voted for amendment to H.R. 10 to complete border fence in 2004

Rep. Sullivan voted in favor of the Ose Amendment to H.R. 10, the 9/11 Recommendations Implementation Act. The Ose Amendment would have ensured completion of the last 14 miles of the San Diego border fence. This would serve as a physical barrier to additional illegal immigration. While the border fence will segment the habitat of a few species and cause localized habitat destruction in the immediate construction zone, it will reduce the widespread destruction of habitat for all species that is caused by large numbers of illegal aliens trampling through pristine areas, leaving huge quantities of trash and human waste, and building campfires that too often turn into devastating wildfires. The Ose Amendment passed by a vote of 252-160.
Voted in favor of amendment to H.R. 10 to prevent illegal aliens from entering the country in 2004


Rep. Sullivan voted in favor of the Souder Amendment to H.R. 10, the 9/11 Recommendations Implementation Act. The Souder Amendment would have given all security screening personnel access to law enforcement and intelligence information maintained by DHS. The Souder Amendment would have helped security screeners identify and stop illegal aliens. The Souder Amendment passed by a vote of 410-0.
Voted against amendment to strip provision to make it harder for terrorists to get asylum in 2004


Rep. Sullivan voted against the Smith Amendment to strip from H.R. 10 the asylum provision that reaffirmed that the burden of proof is on the asylum claimant, and that the adjudicator may require corroborating evidence "where it is reasonable to expect such evidence." This would have made it harder for terrorists to receive asylum in the U.S. by no longer allowing them to claim that the tenets of a terrorist organization are a "political opinion" for which their home government would persecute them if they are denied asylum. The Smith Amendment failed by a vote of 197-219.
Voted against amendment to strip expedited removal for illegal aliens from H.R. 10 in 2004

Rep. Sullivan voted against the Smith Amendment to H.R. 10, the 9/11 Recommendations Implementation Act. The Smith Amendment would have stripped the expanded expedited removal provision from H.R. 10 that requires DHS to utilize expedited removal in the case of all aliens who have entered the U.S. illegally and have not been present in the U.S. for 5 years. This is the provision that had the potential to dramatically increase deportations of illegal aliens by eliminating the appeals process. Somewhere around 2.5 million illegal aliens could be subject to the expedited removal provision. The Smith Amendment failed by a vote of 203-210.
Voted for legislation with significant illegal immigration reduction provisions in 2004

Rep. Sullivan voted in favor of H.R. 10, the 9/11 Recommendations Implementation Act. H.R. 10 represented the primary legislative response in the House of Representatives to the recommendations of The National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States (9-11 Commission). The 9-11 Commission made several recommendations with regard to immigration that, in the Commission's opinion, would increase security and help prevent a future attack. Many of the Commission's immigration recommendations were included in H.R. 10 such as provisions to: prohibit driver's licenses to illegal aliens; expedite removal of illegal aliens; increase Border Patrol and ICE agents; and prevent Federal agencies from accepting or recognizing consular ID as valid proof of identity. H.R. 10 passed by a vote of 282-134.
Voted against a Motion to Recommit with Instructions to strip significant illegal immigration reduction provisions from H.R. 10 in 2004

Rep. Sullivan voted against a Motion to Recommit with Instructions on H.R. 10, the 9/11 Recommendations Implementation Act. H.R. 10 represents the primary legislative response in the House of Representatives to the recommendations of The National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States (9-11 Commission). The 9-11 Commission made several recommendations with regard to immigration that, in the Commission's opinion, would increase security and help prevent a future attack. Many of the Commission's immigration recommendations were included in H.R. 10 such as provisions to: prohibit driver's licenses to illegal aliens; expedite removal of illegal aliens; increase Border Patrol and ICE agents; and prevent Federal agencies from accepting or recognizing consular ID as valid proof of identity. The Motion to Recommit, introduced by Rep. Carolyn Maloney (D-NY), would have effectively stripped ALL of the immigration provisions from H.R. 10, thus removing all of the measures that were based upon the immigration-related recommendations of the 9-11 Commission. The Motion to Recommit failed by a vote of 193-223.
Voted against Motion to Instruct Conferees to strip key illegal immigration reduction provisions from bill in 2004
Rep. Sullivan voted against a Motion to Instruct Conferees on S. 2845, the National Intelligence Reform Act of 2004. S. 2845 represents the primary legislative response in the Senate to the recommendations of The National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States (9-11 Commission), however, it contains NO effective immigration provisions. Alternatively, H.R. 10 represents the primary legislative response in the House of Representatives to the 9-11 Commission. It contains provisions to prohibit driver's licenses to illegal aliens; expedite removal of illegal aliens; increase Border Patrol and ICE agents; and prevent Federal agencies from accepting or recognizing consular ID as valid proof of identity. The Motion to Instruct Conferees on S. 2845 encouraged the Conferees to strip the expedited removal, asylum, and secure ID provisions of H.R. 10 from the final bill. The Motion to Instruct Conferees failed by a vote of 169-229.
Voted against amendment to strip significant illegal immigration reduction provisions from H.R. 10 in 2004

Rep. Sullivan voted against the Menendez Amendment to H.R. 10, the 9/11 Recommendations Implementation Act. H.R. 10 represented the primary legislative response in the House of Representatives to the recommendations of The National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States (9-11 Commission). The 9-11 Commission made several recommendations with regard to immigration that, in the Commission's opinion, would increase security and help prevent a future attack. Many of the Commission's immigration recommendations were included in H.R. 10 such as provisions to: prohibit driver's licenses to illegal aliens; expedite removal of illegal aliens; increase Border Patrol and ICE agents; and prevent Federal agencies from accepting or recognizing consular ID as valid proof of identity. The Menendez Amendment would have stripped ALL of the immigration provisions from H.R. 10, thus removing all of the measures that were based upon the immigration-related recommendations of the 9-11 Commission. The Menendez Amendment failed by a vote of 203-213.
Voted in favor of secure IDs in 2004


Rep. Sullivan voted against the Oxley Amendment (H. AMDT 754) to strip the Culberson Amendment from H.R. 5025, the Transportation, Treasury, and Independent Agencies Appropriations bill. The Culberson amendment would have prohibited the Treasury Department from using any of the funding in the bill to publish, disseminate, authorize or enforce regulations that permit or allow financial institutions to accept the Mexican matricula consular ID card. The Culberson amendment was intended to send a clear message to the Treasury Department and to financial institutions that Mexican matricula consular ID card is neither a secure nor acceptable forms of ID. While it would not have actually required Treasury to change the current regulations which permit financial institutions to accept consular ID cards (rules governing amendments to appropriations bills would not permit such a requirement), it would have made those regulations unenforceable, which is a strong incentive for Treasury to change them. Rep. Oxley offered an amendment to strip the Culberson Amendment from the bill. The Oxley Amendment passed by a vote of 222-177.
Voted against rewarding illegal aliens from Mexico with Social Security benefits in 2004

Rep. Sullivan voted in favor of the Hayworth Amendment (H. AMDT 745) to H.R. 5006, the Labor, HHS, Education Appropriations bill. The amendment would have prohibited any funding in the bill from being used to pay Social Security Administration (SSA) employees to administer any benefits that would not be payable but for a totalization agreement with Mexico. The effect of this would be to prevent the U.S.-Mexico totalization agreement from taking effect -- at least during FY 2005 -- since SSA employees could not be paid for any work they do to determine or pay benefits under the agreement. The U.S.-Mexico totalization agreement would allow both legal AND illegal aliens working in the United States to qualify for Social Security benefits. The amendment failed by a vote of 178-225.
Voted to enforce federal laws against sanctuary policies to protect illegal aliens in 2004

Rep. Sullivan voted in favor of the King Amendment (H. AMDT 655) to the Commerce, Justice, State, Appropriations Act of 2005, H.R. 4754, that would have increased funding to the Justice Department for enforcing current federal law against sanctuary policies for illegal aliens. Sanctuary policies bar public officials, including police officers, from asking an individual's immigration status to determine eligibility for public services and from reporting illegal aliens to federal authorities. In 1996, Congress passed a law that specifically prohibits state and local governments from enacting sanctuary policies. Despite that, cities such as San Francisco, Los Angeles, Chicago and Houston, still have sanctuary policies in place. Maine is the only state with a sanctuary policy. The King Amendment would have allowed the Justice Department to more fully enforce federal law against policies that protect illegal aliens, criminal aliens, and, potentially, terrorists. The amendment failed by a vote of 139-278.
Voted in favor of sanctuary policies to protect illegal aliens in 2004


Rep. Sullivan voted AGAINST an amendment (H. AMDT 583) to the Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Act of 2005, H.R. 4567, that would prohibit homeland security funding from going to states or cities that have violated Federal law by enacting sanctuary policies. Sanctuary policies bar public officials, including police officers, from asking an individual's immigration status to determine eligibility for public services and from reporting illegal aliens to federal authorities. In 1996, Congress passed a law that specifically prohibits state and local governments from enacting sanctuary policies. Despite that, cities such as San Francisco, Los Angeles, Chicago and Houston, still have sanctuary policies in place. Maine is the only state with a sanctuary policy. The amendment, offered by Rep. Tom Tancredo, would have created a huge incentive to rescind the policies that protect illegal aliens, criminal aliens, and, potentially, terrorists, by denying them some Federal funding. The amendment failed by a vote of 148-259.
Voted to authorize the use of the military to assist in border control functions in 2004

Rep. Sullivan voted in favor of the Goode Amendment to H.R. 4200, to authorize the Secretary of Defense to assign members of the military, under certain circumstances, to assist the Department of Homeland Security in the performance of border control functions. The Goode Amendment passed the House by a vote of 231-191.
Voted to extend voluntary workplace verification pilot program in 2003


Rep. Sullivan voted in favor of H.R. 2359, the Basic Pilot Extension Act of 2003. H.R. 2359 would extend for five years the voluntary workplace employment eligibility authorization pilot programs created in 1996. This program is an important component of preventing illegal aliens from taking jobs from those who have the legal right to work in this country. H.R. 2359 passed the House Judiciary Committee by a vote of 18 to 8 before being brought up on the suspension calendar. Because it was brought up on the suspension calendar, no amendments were allowed to be offered to the bill and the bill needed a two-thirds majority in order to pass. Thus, even though a majority of Representatives voted in favor of H.R. 2359 (231-170), it failed because a two-thirds majority did not vote in favor of it. However, the Basic Pilot Extension Act eventually passed the Senate by Unanimous Consent as S. 1685. Then, the House passed by voice vote S. 1685 and it was signed by the President, becoming Public Law No. 108-156.
Voted in favor of amendment to fight foreign IDs for illegal aliens in 2003


Rep. Sullivan voted in favor of the Hostettler Amendment to H.R. 1950, the Foreign Relations Authorization Act. The Hostettler Amendment would have put some major restrictions on consular-issued ID cards that are frequently issued to illegal aliens by foreign governments. These cards make it easier for illegal aliens to gain government services and to otherwise profit from their illegal activity. The Hostettler Amendment passed by a vote of 226-198.

Voted to authorize the use of the military to assist in border control functions in 2003


Rep. Sullivan voted in favor of the Goode Amendment to H.R. 1588, to authorize members of the military, under certain circumstances, to assist the Department of Homeland Security in the performance of border control functions. The Goode Amendment passed the House by a vote of 250-179.
Voted to authorize the use of the military to assist in border control efforts in 2002


Rep. Sullivan voted in favor of H. Amdt. 479 to H.R. 4546, the Department of Defense Authorization bill. The amendment authorized the Secretary of Defense to assign members of the military, under certain circumstances, to assist the Bureau of Border Security and U.S. Customs Service of the Department of Homeland Security on preventing the entry of terrorists, drug traffickers, and illegal aliens into the United States The amendment, sponsored by Rep. Goode of Virginia, passed the House by a vote of 232-183.

Voted AGAINST Section 245(i), a form of amnesty for illegal aliens in 2002

Rep. Sullivan voted AGAINST H RES 365 which was brought up and passed in a new form in March of 2002. The vote against the bill was a vote against rewarding illegal aliens via a four-month reinstatement of Section 245(i). That is an expired immigration provision that allows illegal aliens with qualified relatives or employers in the U.S. to pay a $1,000 fine, to apply for a green card in this country, and to be allowed to stay in this country without fear of deportation until their turn arrives for a green card years, and even decades, later. The illegal aliens also would not have to go through the usual security screening in U.S. embassies in their home countries. The lowest estimate from supporters of the bill was that some 200,000 illegal aliens would benefit. H RES 365 also included language that would have implemented some important visa-tracking regulations helpful to discouraging illegal immigration. But all of those provisions had already been passed previously in H.R. 3525, making the assistance to illegal aliens the sole purpose of the bill.Rep. Sullivan was one of 137 Representatives who voted AGAINST the 245(i) amnesty. The bill narrowly passed by a vote of 275 to 137 (a two-thirds majority was needed in order to pass).


Tell Representative Sullivan what you think of his immigration record.
Phone: (202) 225-2211
Fax: (202) 225-9187
E-Mail: email available via website.
Website: http://www.house.gov/sullivan
D.C. Address: 114 CHOB, U.S. House of RepresentativesWashington, DC 20515
District Offices 5727 South LewisSuite 520Tulsa, OK 74105(918) 749-0014 (V), (918) 749-0781 (F)
401 South Johnstone AvenueSuite 348Bartlesville, OK 74003(918) 423-5951 (V), (918) 337-4196 (F)
Tell us if you think you see even the tiniest error on this page.
E-Mail us with corrections: http://numbersusa.com/helpform

_____________________________________________________________________________

THESE ARE THE SENATORS WHO VOTED TO GIVE ILLEGAL ALIENS SOCIAL

SECURITY BENEFITS. REGARDLESS

OF POLITICAL PARTY, THESE POLITICIANS NEED TO BE

DEFEATED IN 2006, 2008 OR 2010 WHENEVER THEY COME

UP FOR OFFICE. SEND THIS TO ANYONE YOU KNOW IN

ANY OF THE STATES LISTED. THE ENTIRE POPULATION OF

THE UNITED STATES NEED TO KNOW THIS INFORMATION.

THAT IS UNLESS THEY DO NOT MIND SHARING THEIR

SOCIAL SECURITY WITH FOREIGN WORKERS WHEN

AMERICAN CITIZENS ARE BEING LEFT OUT.

Grouped by Home State

Alabama:

Alaska: Stevens (R-AK), Yea

Arizona: McCain (R-AZ), Yea

Arkansas: Lincoln (D-AR), Yea Pryor (D-AR), Yea

California: Boxer (D-CA), Yea Feinstein (D-CA), Yea

Colorado: Salazar (D-CO), Yea

Connecticut: Dodd (D-CT), Yea Lieberman (D-CT), Yea

Delaware: Biden (D-DE), Yea Carper (D-DE), Yea

Florida: Martinez (R-FL), Yea

Georgia:

Hawaii: Akaka (D-HI), Yea Inouye (D-HI), Yea

Idaho:

Illinois: Durbin (D-IL), Yea Obama (D-IL), Yea

Indiana: Bayh (D-IN), Yea Lugar (R-IN), Yea

Iowa: Harkin (D-IA), Yea

Kansas: Brownback (R-KS), Yea

Kentucky:

Louisiana: Landrieu (D-LA), Yea

Maine:

Maryland: Mikulski (D-MD), Yea Sarbanes (D-MD), Yea

Massachusetts: Kennedy (D-MA), Yea Kerry (D-MA), Yea

Michigan: Levin (D-MI), Yea Stabenow (D-MI), Yea

Minnesota:

Mississippi:

Missouri:

Montana: Baucus (D-MT), Yea

Nebraska: Hagel (R-NE), Yea

Nevada: Reid (D-NV), Yea

New Hampshire:

New Jersey: Lautenberg (D-NJ), Yea Menendez (D-NJ), Yea

New Mexico: Bingaman (D-NM), Yea

New York: Clinton (D-NY), Yea Schumer (D-NY), Yea

North Carolina:

North Dakota: Dorgan (D-ND), Yea

Ohio: DeWine (R-OH), Yea Voinovich (R-OH), Yea

Oklahoma:

Oregon: Wyden (D-OR), Yea

Pennsylvania: Specter (R-PA), Yea

Rhode Island: Chafee (R-RI), Yea Reed (D-RI), Yea

South Carolina: Graham (R-SC), Yea

South Dakota: Johnson (D-SD), Yea

Tennessee:

Texas:

Utah:

Vermont: Jeffords (I-VT), Yea Leahy (D-VT), Yea

Virginia:

Washington: Cantwell (D-WA), Yea Murray (D-WA), Yea

West Virginia: Rockefeller (D-WV), Not Voting

Wisconsin: Feingold (D-WI), Yea Kohl (D-WI), Yea

Wyoming:

Sullivan Supports Committee Passage of Video Franchising Legislation

WASHINGTON, D.C. – Today, Congressman John Sullivan, a member of the House Energy and Commerce Committee, voted to pass the Communications Opportunity, Promotion, and Enhancement (COPE) Act of 2006. This important legislation will give consumers more choices in their local video service provider and allow competition into the video service market.

“The COPE Act will finally give consumers more control over their local video service provider,” Sullivan said. “Since many markets have had no choice of video service providers for years, allowing for more competition gives consumers the opportunity to choose what services and company fits them best.”

Video service providers are defined as telecommunications companies who offer cable television service to residents in a given area. These include direct broadcast satellite services, traditional local cable television companies and telephone carriers who offer TV service. Many markets have only had one provider to choose from because of long standing regulations requiring these companies to acquire a local franchise in each individual community prior to offering cable service in that community. This legislation creates a national franchising system for all entrants who offer subscription television, therefore eliminating the need for each company to go through a lengthy and costly process of obtaining local permission.

In addition, this legislation requires cable and telephone providers to offer broadband Internet services to their customers without requiring them to subscribe to any of the other services the company provides (telephone, cable, etc.). This allows for consumer to retain total control of what services they choose to subscribe to, based on what fits their needs and budget.

“This landmark, forward-looking legislation has been years in the making. It will increase competition in the video market and allow all Americans to choose a video service provider without hindrance by arcane local and national rules,” Sullivan said. “By increasing competition in all markets, especially in telecommunications, competition will flourish, which is a win-win situation for all consumers.”

Deal Reached on Compromise Immigration Reform Package 04/06/06

Continued from front page:

"While it admittedly is not perfect, the choice we have to make is whether the bill is better than no bill. And I think that is decisive," said Specter, who supported the Democrat-favored bill.
President Bush, traveling in North Carolina, said he was pleased senators were able to find a compromise.
"I appreciate their understanding that this needs to be a comprehensive immigration bill," the president said. "I recognize that there are still details that need to be worked out. I would encourage the members to work hard to get the bill done prior to the upcoming break."
The compromise centers on two of the toughest issues in the immigration debate: creating a path to legalization for 11 million illegal workers in America now and a temporary worker program for future illegals seeking to work legally in America.
It builds on the defeated measure, proposed by Sens. John McCain, R-Ariz., and Sen. Edward Kennedy, D-Mass. That bill contains a guest worker proposal that would have allowed immigrants who entered illegally to stay legally in the country to work and obtain green cards after six years. It also would have let any illegal who arrived before Jan. 7, 2004, to get on the path to citizenship if they maintained jobs and met other conditions. Those include paying back taxes and a fine and being English proficient.
But the compromise measure proposed, first floated Monday night by Republican Sens. Mel Martinez of Florida, himself an immigrant, and Chuck Hagel of Nebraska, would create a three-layer system for current illegal immigrants to gain legal status in the country. The cutoff date plan, known as the "roots concept" by Republicans, would favor those who have lived in the United States longer than five years.
The roots plan gives consideration to much of the McCain-Kennedy bill in terms of the hoops set for illegals to climb through on the path to citizenship, including passing national security and criminal background checks, having been employed for three of the last five years, registering for the Selective Service and working an additional six years after the bill's enactment to ensure that their status is not adjusted before those who are already in line.
It also sets a number of 325,000 — down from 400,000 in the prior bill — of temporary work visas allowed each year. Workers could shift jobs without penalty, being allowed to move from agriculture to service industries without losing their legal status. Before filling any jobs with temporary illegal workers, employers must advertise the job publicly at the prevailing local wage for that job — only after failing to fill that job with legal American workers can the employer hire a temporary illegal immigrant.
The compromise creates a tiered system that gives preference to illegals who have been in the United States longer and have established roots in their communities:
— Illegals in the United States less than two years would be required to leave immediately. If caught once, they would be subject to a misdemeanor, and if caught twice they would be charged with a felony. About 2 million to 3 million people fall into this category.
— Illegals in the United States between two and five years would have go to one of 16 ports of entry in the United States, determined by the U.S. Visit program, and declare themselves. They would be given a temporary visa and allowed back to their U.S. residences immediately. Once in the United States, they could apply for the citizenship path spelled out in the McCain-Kennedy bill. About 3 million to 4 million people fall into this category.
— Illegals who could prove they have been in the United States for more than five years would immediately be given guest worker status and would get on the 11-year path to citizenship. They would not have to declare themselves as guest workers. This path would be open to about 5 million illegals living in the United States.
Support has not been completely lined up. Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas, issued a statement late Wednesday that avoided taking a position on the proposal, but he is expected to oppose it. In his statement, he said he remains "adamant that we not repeat the mistakes of the 1986 bill, a measure widely viewed as having imposed amnesty on those in the country illegally."
The bill also faces amendments and other objections on the Senate floor.
"We're almost there. We're not there. We still have some obstacles. The leader and I have spoken about them the last few hours. There's other pieces of legislation that may interfere. We have some amendments we have to vote on that are going to be hurtful to some people and not to others," said Reid.
"So even though we all feel good about today, it pales in comparison to the millions and millions of people out there who today feel that they have a chance to participate in the American dream," he said
If a bill does pass the Senate, any differences will have to be negotiated with the House. Speaker Dennis Hastert didn't rule out including elements of the Senate bill, and Sen. Jim Sensenbrenner, R-Wis., the sponsor of the more restrictive House bill that passed in December said something must come from the Senate if a final product approved by both chambers is going to be enacted.

The Scott Talk Radio Picks

Soon summer vacation will be upon us, and for those of you who want to keep up with the World, National and Local news, I have a suggestion. AM Talk Radio.

AM Talk Radio is one of the best, if not the best source for news. We have so many talk stations now days with mega information, that you’ll not only get the current news, you’ll get discussion, and that’s where you learn about the goings on here and in the world.

I know that teens like to listen to music, and so do I. What I am saying is take a part of the day and listen to some information radio. I guarantee it’s not going to be boring. Mix it up. It’s my guess it won’t be long before you’ll be listing to more talk than music.

With our nation at war, and teens putting their lives on the line every day, the least we can do at home is keep ourselves well informed about the happenings in our government and in the world.
Here are my picks for the best shows on Talk Radio in the Tulsa market.

5:00 - 9:00AM The Morning Show with Joe Kelly KRMG 740 AM
9:00 -12:00 AM Neal Borts KRMG 740 AM
12:00 - 1:00 PM Midday Oklahoma KRMG 740 AM
1:00 - 4:00 PM Rush Limbaugh KRMG 740 AM
1:00 - 2:00 PM Bill O’Reilly KFAQ 1170 AM
2:00 - 4:00 PM Tony Snow KFAQ 1170AM
4:00 - 7:00 PM Sean Hannity KRMG 740 AM
4:00 - 6:00 PM Laura Ingraham KFAQ 1170 AM
6:00 - 9:00 PM John Gibson KFAQ 1170 AM
9:00 - 12:00 AM Michael Savage KRMG 740 AM
9:00 – 11:00 AM Mark Levin KFAQ 1170 AM

Scott's Pick for Saturday Nights

9:00 - 12:00 AM It's "Saturday Night with Elvis Polo" featuring Jack Bush 1170 AM KFAQ
Winner of the teens4sullivan2008.com "Golden Microphone Award"


Revitalizing Refining Capacity

In September of 2005 the House Energy and Commerce Committee held a hearing to discuss hurricane recovery efforts. At the hearing, Congressman Sullivan addressed the nation's oil refining capacity. Nearly 50 percent of our nation’s refining capacity is located in the region of Hurricane Katrina. The Congressman pointed out that our refining capacity is inadequate. A new refinery has not been built in over 30 years in the U.S.

PRESIDENT BUSH WORRIED ABOUT U.S. PORT DEAL

WASHINGTON — President Bush on Friday said he's worried that this week's meltdown of a U.S. ports deal with a United Arab Emirates-owned company could send the wrong message to important allies in the Middle East.
"I'm concerned about a broader message this issue could send to our friends and allies around the world, particularly in the Middle East," Bush said in remarks to the National Newspaper Association. "In order to win the War on Terror, we have got to strengthen our relationships and friendships with moderate, Arab countries in the Midddle East. UAE is a committed ally in the War on terror, they are a key partner for our military in a critical region."
Although a potentially explosive showdown between and Congress over a controversial ports deal has been mostly defused, there are still some lingering concerns over the deal and even bigger concerns over the broader issue of port security in the United States.
"The problem of the political moment has passed, but the problem of adequate port security still looms large," said Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C.
"There are gaping holes in cargo and port security that need to be plugged," added Sen. Patty Murray, D-Wash. Meanwhile, free talks between the United States and the UAE were postponed Friday. The talks, which were supposed to begin Monday, were postponed because both sides need more time to prepare, according to the office of U.S. Trade Representative Rob Portman. A USTR spokeswoman would not say whether the postponement was related to the ports deal.
The United Arab Emirates-owned company Dubai Ports World said Thursday it would give up its management stake in the ports deal that has caused massive upheaval in Washington, even among the president's own party. The concession came after lawmakers from both sides of the aisle decried the Bush administration for not adequately reviewing the deal they said puts the security of the United States at risk.
"I'm sure the decision by Dubai Ports World was a difficult decision, to hand over port operations they had purchased from another company," Bush said. "My administration was satisfied that port security would not have been undermined by the agreement. Neverthless, Congress was still very much opposed to it. My administration will continue to work with the Congress to provide a greater understanding of how these transactions are approved."
Although the administration insisted that turning over some port operations to the UAE company did not amount to outsourcing port security, lawmakers argued that operations and security go hand-in-hand. The ports in question are currently operated by a British company, Peninsular & Oriental Steam Navigation Co.
Bush has consistently argued that it sends the wrong message to the world to OK deals with some foreign companies and not others. He, along with other White House and U.S. military officials, have consistently said the UAE is a solid ally in the War on Terror, particularly in a region where the United States is in desperate need of support. Plus, Dubai services more U.S. military ships than any other foreign country, the president said.
"They're sharing intelligence so we can hunt down the terrorists. ...They helped us shut down a world wide proliferation network run by A.Q. Khan," Bush said, referring to the Pakistani scientist who sold nuclear technology to Iran, North Korea and Libya.
"UAE is a valued and strategic partner," the president continued. "I'm committed to strengthening our relationship with the UAE."
Some business corners are also warning lawmakers not to take any hasty action that may put a damper on trade between the United States and the Middle East.
"While the security of the American people and our critical infrastructure must always be a top priority, implementing the laws that could harm the health of our economy in the name of national security would be a grave mistake," said Bruce Josten, executive vice president for government affairs at the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. "All parties involved must strive to find a balance that keeps us safe while at the same time allows our economy to continue to flourish."

CONGRESSMAN SULLIVAN PLEASED WITH HANDOVER IN PORT DEAL

WASHINGTON, D.C. – Congressman Sullivan issued the following statement regarding the decision by Dubai Port World to transfer its operations of six American ports to a U.S. company:

“Securing our nation’s ports is vital to protecting Americans against terrorism. My constituents have repeatedly contacted me over the last few weeks to express their outrage over this issue. In addition, I have expressed grave concerns regarding this deal and am pleased that my colleagues in the House took action against this proposal, hearing loud and clear the security concerns of the American people. Port security is a vital step in maintaining border security and national security.”

WASHINGTON -- Recruiters Allowed on Campus--The Supreme Court ruled unanimously Monday that colleges that accept federal money must allow military recruiters on campus, despite university objections to the Pentagon's "don't ask, don't tell" policy on gays.
Justices rejected a free-speech challenge from law school professors who claimed they should not be forced to associate with military recruiters or promote their campus appearances.
Chief Justice John Roberts wrote the decision, which was unanimous.
Law schools had become the latest battleground over the "don't ask, don't tell" policy allowing gay men and women to serve in the military only if they keep their sexual orientation to themselves.
Many universities forbid the participation of recruiters from public agencies and private companies that have discriminatory policies.
Roberts, writing his third decision since joining the court, said there are other less drastic options to protest the policy.
"A military recruiter's mere presence on campus does not violate a law school's right to associate, regardless of how repugnant the law school considers the recruiter's message," he wrote.
The federal law, known as the Solomon Amendment after its first congressional sponsor, mandates that universities give the military the same access as other recruiters or forfeit federal money.
College leaders have said they could not afford to lose federal help, some $35 billion a year.

Source: Newsmax.com 3-6-06

Senate Passes Patriot Act

WASHINGTON -- The Senate on Thursday voted overwhelmingly to renew the USA Patriot Act, after months of pitched debate over legislation that supporters said struck a better balance between privacy rights and the government's power to hunt down terrorists.
The 89-10 vote marked a bright spot in President Bush's troubled second term as his approval ratings dipped over the war in Iraq and his administration's response to Hurricane Katrina. Renewing the act, congressional Republicans said, was key to preventing more terror attacks in the United States.
The House was expected to pass the legislation next week and send it to Bush, who would sign it before 16 provisions expire March 10.
A December filibuster led by Sen. Russell Feingold, D-Wis., and joined by several libertarian-leaning Republicans, forced the Bush administration to agree to modest new curbs on government power.
Feingold insisted those new protections are cosmetic.
"Americans want to defeat terrorism and they want the basic character of this country to survive and prosper," he said. "They want both security and liberty, and unless we give them both - and we can if we try - we have failed."
Lawmakers who voted for the package acknowledged deep reservations about the power it would grant to whomever holds the White House.
"Our support for the Patriot Act does not mean a blank check for the president," said Democratic leader Harry Reid. "What we tried to do on a bipartisan basis is have a better bill. It has been improved."
The vote was a significant victory for Bush after revelations late last year that he had authorized a domestic wiretapping program provided ammunition to senators demanding more privacy protections in the Patriot Act.
Senate Democrats and a few Republicans refused to allow a vote before Christmas on renewing the law before 16 provisions expired on Dec. 31.

This news is from Newsmax.com

Sullivan Works to Reduce Federal Spending

WASHINGTON, D.C. – Representative John Sullivan (OK-01) was joined today by 216 U.S. House of Representatives colleagues in passing the first deficit reduction bill in almost 10 years. The Deficit Reduction Act of 2005, H.R. 4241, provides $39 billion in savings over 5 years in the government’s mandatory spending programs, which are not subject to the annual appropriations process.
The Deficit Reduction Act reforms several government programs and achieves considerable savings in government expenditures. Sullivan said, “The bill reforms government programs that, in the past, have been allowed to grow on auto-pilot every year. The money saved by this plan, close to $40 billion, ensures future generations will not be saddled with unmanageable debt and restores our government to a sound fiscal standing.” The Deficit Reduction Act is the result of a special budget process (as laid out in the Congressional Budget Act of 1974) for considering changes in entitlement and tax law. It is primarily intended for deficit reduction and reducing mandatory spending.

“The Deficit Reduction Act is not just about saving money; it is about ensuring that our largest, most critical government programs are meeting their core missions – to help those most in need,” Sullivan said. Many of our largest mandatory entitlement programs spend billions of taxpayer dollars each year. Over time, these programs must be modernized and improved to keep up with innovations in technology and changes in the marketplace.
Sullivan said, “Now is the time to reassert our commitment to limited government and fiscal discipline. We must begin by making a down payment on the economic well-being of future generations, and being more realistic in our spending. With the Deficit Reduction Act, House Republicans are reforming government, reducing the deficit, and renewing our commitment to hardworking American taxpayers.”

Statement by Congressman John Sullivan on Lobbying Reform

WASHINGTON, D.C. – The House of Representatives passed today H. Res. 648, which bars former members of Congress who are registered lobbyists from the House floor and gymnasium. The resolution is the first of several pieces of legislation expected to be introduced in an effort to reform lobbying regulations. Congressman John Sullivan issued the following statement:

“This resolution is the first step in the process of reforming lobbying practices and regaining the trust of the American public. Lobbying regulations must be clearly defined and strictly enforced to ensure voters are being honestly represented by their elected Members.

“In the President’s State of the Union address last night he remarked on reforming the ethical standards in Washington D.C. I agree with him that we must ensure that the oath we take as federal officials must be upheld. I recently worked with my colleagues to introduce a bill that requires Federal employees who have been convicted of a crime to forfeit their pensions. This pension forfeiture is practiced in the private sector and we must hold government officials to the same strict standards of accountability.”

Statement by Congressman John Sullivan on the President’s State of the Union Address

WASHINGTON, D.C. –Congressman John Sullivan released the following statement regarding President Bush’s State of the Union address to the joint session of Congress:

“Tonight, the President spoke to the country and to Congress about the responsibility of the U.S. to lead. We must continue to promote peace and democracy throughout the world, and prosperity here at home. We can no longer afford to put a band-aid on problems such as rising gas prices, foreign policy, our domestic economy, and the health of our citizens. These are issues that we must combat head-on with bold leadership and drive. Often, it is far easier to maintain the status quo than to lead the charge, but without vision and resolve we become second best in an advancing world.

“Oklahoma has long been a leader in energy production and is in a prime position to help fulfill our nation’s energy needs. Around the world, countries are developing and utilizing alternative fuels, and the United States must join in developing these technologies. We have always had the brainpower and manpower in Oklahoma to help fill our nation’s energy gap. Not only can we contribute by increasing our gas and oil production, but as energy technology evolves, Oklahoma will remain at the forefront of this important industry. Our dependence on foreign oil has gone on for too long; it is a vulnerability that we must end before it is exploited.

“The President rightly addressed the tone in Washington D.C. Congress must regain the trust of the American public through proactive leadership. I recently worked with my colleagues to introduce a bill that requires Federal employees who have been convicted of a crime to forfeit their pensions. This pension forfeiture is practiced in the private sector and we must hold government officials to the same strict standards of accountability.

“Finally, we must continue our steadfast resolve in the war on terror. To achieve this goal, we must secure our borders. Every day, illegal aliens are crossing into the United States without detection and with fraudulent identification. These aliens come from all over the world, including countries that harbor enemies of the U.S. Border security is national security. We have to demonstrate that we can effectively enforce immigration laws before even considering a guest worker policy. While our troops are fighting a foreign enemy abroad and working to secure Iraq, we must ensure they have a nation with protected borders when they come home.”

Statement by Congressman John Sullivan on Palestine Elections

WASHINGTON, D.C. – Congressman John Sullivan (OK-01) released this statement following the President’s remarks on the topic of immigration reformPalestinians voted yesterday to replace the longtime rule of the Fatah party, and elected the Hamas party, a known terrorist organization, to govern the Palestinian people. Congressman John Sullivan (R-OK) issued the following remarks:
“This is a stunning course of events. Yesterday, the Fatah party was leading in the polls, and today, there is a terrorist organization in power in Palestine. The Hamas victory disrupts the prospects for Middle East peace and sends a dangerous signal to our friends in Israel.
“We must not discount that the elections in Palestine were democratic, despite the outcome. However, in their platform Hamas continues to advocate for the destruction of Israel. The United States cannot work with countries that support the destruction of another country.
“Hamas leaders are already issuing statements that they will not change their charter, which does not recognize Israel. We must continue to support our democratic allies in Israel as they strive for a peaceful existence with their neighbors in the Middle East.
“Our government has continually supported the Palestinian people by sending almost $275 million in aid to the country last year. If this new government continues to support terrorism and the destruction of Israel, I will strongly object to the United States sending taxpayer funds to support a terrorist-controlled country.”

Statement by Congressman John Sullivan on the President’s Budget Request

WASHINGTON, D.C. – President Bush sent his proposed FY2007 federal budget to Congress today, outlining his requests for spending. Congressman John Sullivan (R-OK) issued the following remarks:

“We owe the American taxpayers a fiscally responsible budget. Soon, Congress will work toward the goal of reigning in spending, reducing the federal deficit, protecting our citizens from terrorism, and continuing America’s strong economic growth. Government spending is at an all time high, and I look forward to working with my colleagues and the President to ensure that vital programs receive funding and that ineffective or duplicative programs are eliminated.

“The unemployment rate has dropped to 4.7 percent, the lowest it has been since July 2001; 4.7 million jobs have been created in a little over two years, more jobs than Japan and the European Union combined; and our economy is growing faster than other major industrialized nations. We must continue our successful policies that have encouraged a strong economy and job creation.”

“The budget proposal is putting the cart before the horse on immigration issues. The President’s budget includes $247 million to implement a Temporary Worker Program, possibly granting legal status to illegal aliens. I am concerned this program could develop into amnesty for illegal aliens, something I have been working against for years. I believe funds should be put towards enforcing our current immigration laws before we create a new program. Simply put, Congress must fund enforcement first. The President’s budget proposal does add funding for new border patrol agents and detention beds; however, these numbers come up short.”

SULLIVAN LEGISLATION HONORS OKLAHOMA VETERAN AND THE FIRST NATIVE AMERICAN TO RECEIVE THE CONGRESSIONAL MEDAL OF HONOR

Names Tulsa VA Outpatient Clinic after Ernest Childers


WASHINGTON, D.C. –Yesterday, Congressman John Sullivan introduced H.R. 4744, to designate the Department of Veterans Affairs Outpatient Clinic in Tulsa as the Ernest Childers Department of Veterans Affairs Outpatient Clinic.

“I am pleased to introduce legislation to designate the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Outpatient Clinic in Tulsa, Oklahoma as the Ernest Childers VA Outpatient Clinic to honor one of our nation’s finest military heroes,” Sullivan said. “Lieutenant Colonel Childers’s contributions to our American armed forces will be forever remembered by his fellow Creek Indians and by all Oklahomans.”

The middle of five children, Childers enlisted in the Okalahoma National Guard at Chilocco Indian School in 1937. After completing basic training at Fort Sill, he was deployed to Africa in World War II. Childers also served the U.S. Army in Austria, Panama, Korea, Alaska, Georgia, California, Kansas and Oklahoma prior to his retirement in August of 1965. In addition to receiving the Congressional Medal of Honor, Childers was the recipient of 13 medals and bars, including the Purple Heart and the Oklahoma Distinguished Service Cross. Childers was honored in 1966 by the Tulsa Chapter of the Council of American Indians as “Oklahoma’s Most Outstanding Indian” and, in 1985, the Ernest Childers Middle School was dedicated in Broken Arrow, Oklahoma. He passed away on March 17, 2005 after a long illness and was survived by his wife, Yolanda, and their three children. “We were honored to have him grace us with his model character, defend us with his bravery, and leave us all with an example of a life well-lived.”

“Lt. Col. Childers holds the distinction of being the first Native American to received the Congressional Medal of Honor for his bravery and heroic efforts in World War II when his selfless actions allowed American troops to successfully advance and win the Battle of Oliveto, Italy,” Sullivan said. “Along with the entire Oklahoma delegation, I am humbled to introduce this legislation to honor his life and legacy.”

HOUSE CONDEMNS HAMAS GOVERNED PALESTINIAN AUTHORITY


WASHINGTON, D.C. –Today, Congressman John Sullivan joined his colleagues in the U.S. House of Representatives in supporting S. Con. Res. 79, a resolution expressing Congress’ belief that no U.S. assistance should be provided directly to the Palestinian Authority if any member of the party holding a parliamentary seat maintains a position calling for the destruction of Israel. Palestinians voted in early February to replace the longtime ruling Fatah party with the Hamas party, a Middle East terrorist organization, well-known for carrying out atrocities such as suicide bombings and funding terror strikes against the Israeli people.

Congressman Sullivan issued the following statement on the passage of this legislation:

“As long as Hamas continues to support atrocious terrorist attacks, the United States will not support them – financially or otherwise. In addition, the U.S. will not cooperate with countries which support the destruction of another country and the Hamas platform clearly advocates for Israel’s destruction. Our government has long supported the Palestinian people by sending almost $275 million in aid last year alone. However, with the Hamas party in control of parliament, they can not be trusted to see that the aid our country sends is used in an appropriate manner. Therefore, the U.S. must halt all aid to the Palestinian people while these terrorists run their government. As stewards to the American tax payer, it is Congress’ job to make sure that their tax money is not used to fund terrorist controlled countries. We must continue to support our democratic allies in Israel, as they strive for a peaceful existence with their neighbors in the Middle East”

SULLIVAN QUESTIONS DECISION WHICH THREATENS U.S. PORT SECURITY

WASHINGTON, D.C. –Today, Congressman Sullivan issued the following statement regarding the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United State’s decision to allow a United Arab Emirates controlled company to take control over U.S. seaports:

“Securing our nation’s ports is vital to protecting Americans against terrorists. Recently, the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) approved a deal in which six ports up and down the U.S. East Coast, from New York to Miami, have been sold to Dubai Ports World, a United Arab Emirates (UAE) state-owned and controlled company. I am very concerned about the continued security of these ports at the hands of a country with known terrorist ties. We cannot let our port security, and in turn our national security, be compromised under the guise of foreign investment. President Bush has until March 2nd to overrule the approval of the sale and I encourage the President to examine all facets of the deal, especially our ability to ensure that the highest level of security is maintained. The forces of a market economy should function as free from government intervention as possible; however, we must take steps to ensure that our national security is not placed at risk by foreign investment, especially by state-owned entities.

This is not the first time that CFIUS has approved a deal which could have been detrimental to America’s security. In July 2005, the Committee approved a bid for China National Offshore Oil Corporation to merge with American energy corporation UNOCAL. Eventually, UNOCAL’s board of directors decided to accept a revised bid from Chevron, keeping U.S. energy resources in American hands.

It is vital that members of CFIUS and the Administration keep America’s national and economic security in the forefront of their minds when they are making decisions regarding foreign investments. I believe the Administration should conduct a thorough investigation of the sale, so that a full examination of Dubai Ports World and its roots in UAE become more transparent. Port security is a vital step in maintaining border security and thus national security.”

NEW YORKIsaac Hayes has quit "South Park," Associated Press 03/14/06

where he voices Chef, saying he can no longer stomach its take on religion.
Hayes, who has played the ladies' man/school cook in the animated Comedy Central satire since 1997, said in a statement Monday that he feels a line has been crossed.
"There is a place in this world for satire, but there is a time when satire ends and intolerance and bigotry towards religious beliefs of others begins," the 63-year-old soul singer and outspoken Scientologist said.
"Religious beliefs are sacred to people, and at all times should be respected and honored," he continued. "As a civil rights activist of the past 40 years, I cannot support a show that disrespects those beliefs and practices."
"South Park" co-creator Matt Stone responded sharply in an interview with The Associated Press Monday, saying, "This is 100 percent having to do with his faith of Scientology... He has no problem — and he's cashed plenty of checks — with our show making fun of Christians."
Last November, "South Park" targeted the Church of Scientology and its celebrity followers, including actors Tom Cruise and John Travolta, in a top-rated episode called "Trapped in the Closet." In the episode, Stan, one of the show's four mischievous fourth graders, is hailed as a reluctant savior by Scientology leaders, while a cartoon Cruise locks himself in a closet and won't come out.
Stone told The AP he and co-creator Trey Parker "never heard a peep out of Isaac in any way until we did Scientology. He wants a different standard for religions other than his own, and to me, that is where intolerance and bigotry begin."